Discipline and Punish: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hoppinglife (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Hoppinglife (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
{{Quote|text=It is ugly to be punishable, but there is no glory in punishing.|sign=Foucault|source=The body of the condemned}} | {{Quote|text=It is ugly to be punishable, but there is no glory in punishing.|sign=Foucault|source=The body of the condemned}} | ||
{{Quote|text=Beneath the increasing leniency of punishment, then, one may map a displacement of its point of application; and through this displacement, a whole field of recent objects, a whole new system of truth and a mass of roles hitherto unknown in the exercise of criminal justice. A corpus of knowledge, techniques, ‘scientific’ discourses is formed and becomes entangled with the practice of the power to punish.|sign=Foucault|source=The body of the condemned}} | {{Quote|text=Beneath the increasing leniency of punishment, then, one may map a displacement of its point of application; and through this displacement, a whole field of recent objects, a whole new system of truth and a mass of roles hitherto unknown in the exercise of criminal justice. A corpus of knowledge, techniques, ‘scientific’ discourses is formed and becomes entangled with the practice of the power to punish.|sign=Foucault|source=The body of the condemned}} | ||
{{Quote|text=We should admit rather that power produces knowledge (and not simply by encouraging it because it serves power or by applying it because it is useful); that power and knowledge directly imply one another; that there is no power relation without the correlative constitution of a field of knowledge, nor any knowledge that does not presuppose and constitute at the same time power relations.|sign=Foucault|source=The body of the condemned}} | |||
=== Suplement details === | === Suplement details === | ||
| Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
* Does the examination reveal any mental or psychic abnormalities in the subject? If so, describe them and specify to which conditions they are related. | * Does the examination reveal any mental or psychic abnormalities in the subject? If so, describe them and specify to which conditions they are related. | ||
* Is the | * Is the offense with which the subject is charged related to such abnormalities or not? | ||
* Is the subject in a dangerous condition? | * Is the subject in a dangerous condition? | ||
* Is the subject eligible for criminal sanction? | * Is the subject eligible for criminal sanction? | ||
* Is the subject curable or rehabilitatable? | * Is the subject curable or rehabilitatable? | ||
* Was the subject in a state of insanity within the meaning of Article 64 of the Penal Code at the time of the offence? | * Was the subject in a state of insanity within the meaning of Article 64 of the Penal Code at the time of the offence? | ||
* Punishment as a way to support the political-economy of the time. | |||
* A history of the body in the political field and its relationship with power. | |||
* Power and knowledge directly imply one another. | |||
Article 64 requires to specify whether the crime was committed in a state of insanity. | Article 64 requires to specify whether the crime was committed in a state of insanity. | ||