Discipline and Punish: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hoppinglife (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Hoppinglife (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* Discussion on the objective of punishment - if not on the body, it must be on the soul. Punish intention rather than action. Establish the causal relationship between the two. | * Discussion on the objective of punishment - if not on the body, it must be on the soul. Punish intention rather than action. Establish the causal relationship between the two. | ||
* Insanity and judgment - creating subsidiary judicial power for experts, doctors, etc. Not responsibility, but usefulness. Something other than crimes. | * Insanity and judgment - creating subsidiary judicial power for experts, doctors, etc. Not responsibility, but usefulness. Something other than crimes. | ||
* A ''whole new system of truth'' that is used to judge. | |||
* Analyze the penal leniency as a technique of power. Four rules: (1) view punishment as a complex social function. (2) analyze punitive methods as techniques for power. (3) unify the penal system and the knowledge of man. (4) whether this transformation is the way of how one's body is treated by power relations. - a common history of power relations and object relations. | |||
| Line 45: | Line 48: | ||
* Tristlewood. | * Tristlewood. | ||
* French code of 1791. | * French code of 1791. | ||
* Rusche and Kirchheimer, Punishment and Social Structures. | |||